首页> 外文OA文献 >Malpractice Payouts and Malpractice Insurance: Evidence from Texas Closed Claims, 1990–2003*
【2h】

Malpractice Payouts and Malpractice Insurance: Evidence from Texas Closed Claims, 1990–2003*

机译:医疗事故支出和医疗事故保险:1990年至2003年间德克萨斯州已关闭索赔的证据;

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using medical malpractice claims with payments of $25,000 or more that closed in Texas from 1990 to 2003, this study quantifies physicians' insurance limits and examines the connection between policy size and payments on claims. It finds that most physicians had less than $1 million (nominal) in coverage, that real policy size declined, that settlements at the policy limits were common, that payment size was stable or falling, and that payments above the policy limits were rare. It also finds that physicians rarely made out-of-pocket payments, suggesting the policy limits often cap recoveries, and that the frequency of out-of-pocket payments declined as policy size increased. Results are presented separately for “perinatal physicians.”The Geneva Papers (2008) 33, 177–192. doi:10.1057/gpp.2008.3
机译:使用1990年至2003年在得克萨斯州关闭并支付了25,000美元或更多的医疗事故医疗索赔,这项研究量化了医生的保险限额,并研究了保单规模与理赔金额之间的联系。它发现大多数医生的承保范围少于100万美元(名义),实际保单规模下降,按保单限额结算的情况很普遍,付款规模稳定或下降,而且很少出现超出保单限额的付款。研究还发现,医生很少进行自付费用,这表明保单限额常常限制了回收率,而且自付费用的频率随着保单规模的增加而下降。结果分别提供给“围产期医师”。Geneva Papers(2008)33,177–192。 doi:10.1057 / gpp.2008.3

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号